“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of past seen.
one hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it's practical for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has attained into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it's got arrived at this kind of stage. Read more
4. Record shows that the petitioner is booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Even though the petitioner has obtained bail in These cases, it does, prima facie, create that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade with the accused has not been conducted however. In the instant case, now the accused attempted to just take advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image from the petitioner was extensively circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity from the accused through electronic media. The legislation lends assurance to the accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and produced images. Other than, the images shown around the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to cover his identity until eventually he was place up for an identification parade. Making photos in the accused publically, both by showing the same for the witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or software, would create doubt during the proceedings on the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be certain that there isn't any chance with the witness to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or maybe the press or electronic media. Specified the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe check here and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
If a target is shot at point-blank variety, it may well still be fair to infer that the accused meant death. However, that is not always the case.
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford a possibility of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
Section 302 on the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
This case has actually been cited in many subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, as well as the rule of regulation.
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (three), continues to be setting a precedent which allows for much much easier access on the public to method the superior courts and also the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
[3] For example, in England, the High Court and the Court of Appeals are each bound by their individual previous decisions, however, since the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, although in practice it hardly ever does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent is definitely the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom ruled that it as well as the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the legislation for approximately 30 years.
This section specifically applies to civil servants that are rendered surplus due to reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are not matter to your provisions of your Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the utilizing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not use to non-civil servants. Read more